Wednesday, 5 March 2014

DONT BE A DICKHEAD

This campaign, coincidently was recently created. After my idea of course!

My poster could go well with it?



John Ibrahim launches ‘Don’t be a dickhead’ ad to promote the fight against alcohol-fuelled violence

Autoplay
“DON’T be a dickhead” is the message from King of the Cross John Ibrahim in an anti-violence video starring his mates Kyle Sandilands and Koby Abberton.
The Youtube video underlies Ibrahim’s recent public campaign to put the onus on friends to look out for each other on a night out.
Standing on Kings Cross’s Darlinghurst Road Ibrahim lays out his message as a series of clips plays of friends defusing volatile situations with the line “don’t be a dickhead”.
“This generation is just running wild at the moment; they need a little bit of guidance,” he says in the video.
“They need to actually start policing themselves and take a little more responsibility for their actions.
“You’ve got a lot of drunken behaviour that is out-of-control; the government lockout is a good start. Self-policing is gonna be the answer, the police can’t be everywhere.”
MORE TOP NEWS
Using his own friends to demonstrate the point, Kyle Sandilands breaks up a fight a mate is about to start over a bump in the street.
Bra Boy professional surfer Koby Abberton does his bit pulling a friend away from an argument over a taxi.
 Nightclub owner and operator John Ibrahim seen outside one of his establishments in Kings Cross, Sydney, NSW. The Daily Tele...
Nightclub owner and operator John Ibrahim seen outside one of his establishments in Kings Cross.Source: News Limited
“Every group has got a moron in their group; I know I have a few. You need friends to actually step up and step in,” Ibrahim said.
“If you’re a real friend you step in and you stop your stop your friend from making an idiot of themselves, hurting themselves, or worse, hurting someone else.
“It happens over the simplest things, a bump in the street, a fight over a cab, someone hassles your girl. Don’t be a dickhead.”

My Dickhead Idea...

So my idea for creating posters talking about the subculture of the new age male and how they're dickheads is underway.

This is a great article about dickheads, violence and selfies.


THE bloke accused of the coward punch murder of Daniel Christie appears to be the pin-up boy for a new ugliness in our culture which didn't exist when I was young.

He is a lover of social media, and has turned his dopey little corner of the internet into his personal shrine. He's posted an endless series of snaps and selfies flexing his pecs, showing off his tatts in a ripped muscle shirt, triumphantly holding an empty bottle of Bundy, apparently consumed in its entirety, in what may be the crowning achievement of his life to date.
He's a bloke who didn't go to my high school. None of us who went on to university acted like him. Not one of my friends who left school in Year 10 and Year 11 to become a tradie or work at the local car factory acted like him either.
He is a new Australian man. He is also a man, to borrow a crude but evocative phrase from the youngsters, who I really wish would just f*** off and die.
It appears to be mandatory to describe the random, mindless violence we have seen in pubs and on footpaths around the nation as "alcohol-fuelled" violence.I hate this term.
A more appropriate term would be scumbag-fuelled violence, as the focus on alcohol lets the scumbags off the hook.
There are tens of thousands of Australians who frequently engage in what those abstemious folks in the health lobby describe as "dangerous" drinking.



Shaun McNeil, who allegedly king-hit Daniel Christie on News Year\s Eve.
They do so without sending anyone to hospital, or to an early grave. I am one of them. So is almost everyone I know.
For me, "dangerous" drinking brings with it the risk of winding up in a karaoke bar and singing a woeful version of Air Supply's "All Out Of Love" or having a savage argument with my mate Darien about the result of the 1978 SANFL grand final.
This is the kind of thing which happens to the overwhelming majority of Australians when they drink to what the experts call "dangerous" levels. They end up having a dangerously good time, where the only real danger is that somebody might die laughing.
The current emphasis on the availability of alcohol, on alcohol advertising and sports sponsorships, and the mindless persecution of publicans who have a vested (and demonstrated) interest in preventing violence on their premises....it's largely a load of exculpatory nonsense which elevates the role of external factors and lets flawed individuals off the hook.
Excessive drinking has always been with us. The nation was founded by some of the world's most accomplished pissheads. The die was cast that night in or around 1788 when they decided to let the female convicts ashore and the blokes broke into the rum supplies, and Sydney's first street party erupted down by the Tank Stream.
The statistics suggest that something has changed in the past decade, with 91 deaths from coward punches since the year 2000.
Blaming alcohol is a cop-out. The people who deserve the blame hail from that moronic new breed of man described above. For what it's worth, my rat fur-lined theory is that three things have changed since I was at high school and starting out with grog.
One involves the vain and vacuous world of social media. Another goes to the increasing use of steroids and methamphetamine. The third is the influence of bikie culture on the cultural mainstream.

CHRISTIE MURDER CHARGE FORMALLY LAID1:31

http://content5.video.news.com.au/NDM_CP_-_Sky_News/270/350/2429908380_promo213928543_316x237_2429908591-pre.jpg
A murder charge has been formally laid against Daniel Christie's alleged attacker Shaun McNeil.
For all its upsides, one of the defining features of social media is its absurd level of self-absorption. The he-men of the past had only a mirror in which to admire themselves, a bit like Robert De Niro as Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver.
Nowadays they can find equally feeble-minded narcissists in cyberspace where they can boast about their physical prowess, be it their ability to cut their heads open by crushing a beer can and withstand the pain, to put the gloves on and lay into the heavy bag at the local gym, or in the worst cases, to chronicle their own acts of violence or vandalism towards people and property with stills and video.
I can't comment about McNeil, but many of these blokes also fit into the second category of being both pumped up on steroids and jacked up on speed. This week I interviewed a drug and alcohol researcher who said one of the emerging (and urgent) areas of research went to the interplay between booze, speed and steroids, and the subsequently aberrant behaviour of those who were taking this insane cocktail, perhaps on account of sporting a pair of ossified testicles though their habitual steroid use.
Give me two stubbies of Cascade, four glasses of shiraz and a Beam and Coke any day.
The third point can best be illustrated through the way in which a lot of these blokes carry themselves and choose to dress. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting that having a tatt or wearing a certain outfit makes you a violent person. If you want to get a tatt, good luck to you. But if you look at these blokes, they can often be found aping (an apt word) the sort of "hard-casual" look affected by the bikie gangs, with the neck and face tatts, the G-Star Raw tees, deliberately one size too small, and most tellingly of all, a weird way of walking from side to side with their arms formed in triangles, as if they're ready to punch pretty much anyone, anywhere, any time.
It's because they are.
Our nation was once largely comprised of genial, drunken boofheads who were most at risk of passing out in a mate's toilet.
You would measure the success of a night on the turps by how much fun you've had. Sickeningly, for this new breed of blokes, you measure its success by the number of strangers you've belted.

 Poster ideas for greed vs altruism

5 tax deductions that favor the rich

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/tax-deductions-favor-rich-1.aspx

DID YOU KNOW THAT CELEBRITIES CAN CLAIM TAX BACK ON THEIR DONATIONS TO CHARITIES!?


3. Compelling Reasons You Can Never Trust The Mainstream Media


1. Mainstream media exists solely to make profit

What´s the purpose of the mainstream media? Saying that the press exists to inform, educate or entertain is like saying Apple corporation´s primary function is to make technology which will enrich our lives. Actually, the mass media industry is the same as any other in a capitalist society: it exists to make profit. Medialens, a British campaigning site which critiques mainstream (or corporate) journalism, quoted business journalist Marjorie Kelly as saying that all corporations, including those dealing with media, exist only to maximize returns to their shareholders. This is, she said,  ´the law of the land…universally accepted as a kind of divine, unchallengeable truth´. Without pleasing shareholders and a board of directors, mass media enterprises simply would not exist. And once you understand this, you´ll never watch the news in the same way again.

2Advertisers dictate content
So how does the pursuit of profit affect the news we consume? Media corporations make the vast majority (typically around 75%) of their profit from advertising, meaning it´s advertisers themselves that dictate content- not journalists, and certainly not consumers. Imagine you are editor of a successful newspaper or TV channel with high circulation or viewing figures. You attract revenue from big brands and multinational corporations such as BP, Monsanto and UAE airlines. How could you then tackle important topics such as climate change, GM food or disastrous oil spills in a way that is both honest to your audience and favorable to your clients? The simple answer is you can´t. This might explain why Andrew Ross Sorkin of the New York Times-  sponsored by Goldman Sachs-  is so keen to defend the crooked corporation. Andrew Marr, a political correspondent for the BBC, sums up the dilemma in his autobiography: ´The biggest question is whether advertising limits and reshapes the news agenda. It does, of course. It’s hard to make the sums add up when you are kicking the people who write the cheques.´ Enough said…
3. Billionaire tycoons & media monopolies threaten real journalism 
The monopolization of the press (fewer individuals or organizations controlling increasing shares of the mass media) is growing year by year, and this is a grave danger to press ethics and diversity. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch´s  neo-liberal personal politics are reflected in his 175 newspapers and endorsed by pundits (see Fox news) on the 123 TV channels he owns in the USA alone. Anyone who isn´t worried by this one man´s view of the world being consumed by millions of people across the globe- from the USA to the UK, New Zealand to Asia, Europe to Australia- isn´t thinking hard enough about the consequences. It´s a grotesquely all-encompassing monopoly, leaving no doubt that Murdoch is one of the most powerful men in the world. But as the News International phone hacking scandal  showed, he´s certainly not the most honorable or ethical. Neither is Alexander Lebedev, a former KGB spy and politician who bought British newspaper The Independent  in 2010.  With Lebedev´s fingers in so many pies (the billionaire oligarch is into everything from investment banking to airlines), can we really expect news coverage from this once well-respected publication to continue in the same vein? Obviously not: the paper had always carried a banner on its front page declaring itself  ´free from party political bias, free from proprietorial influence´, but interestingly this was dropped in September 2011.


Read more: http://www.trueactivist.com/10-disturbing-facts-about-the-mainstream-media/


Pros and Cons about mining in Australia:

1. Iron ore and coal are in demand by China and India.These two huge populations need to fuel their rapidly expanding manufacturing industries and to build bridges, roads, skyscrapers and houses.
2. The boom has strengthened the Australian dollar.This indirect benefit has affected every consumer – you’re reaping the rewards whenever you purchase imported goods.
3. The mining workforce has doubled since 2004.
That means entire new communities have been established in Western Australia and Queensland.
4. Sectors like tourism are actually suffering from the boom.Manufacturing and domestic tourism have been hit by the stronger Australian dollar.
5. Tourism is forced to discount deals.
Many resorts in Queensland for example are offering bargain deals to attract travellers both from Australia and offshore.
6. Agriculture has given way to resources as our largest export industry.
Farming industries like wool and wheat are now only a small proportion of Australia’s wealth. In 1990 agriculture exports made up 16% of all exportsbut that has since been surpassed by our resources industries.
7. Australia will have to skill up its workforce in future.As our wealth grows, Australia will have to find more skilled workers and build more infrastructure to support growing communities.
8. Getting a fair go.
As a nation we will need to decide how we all get a fair share of mining wealth without biting the hand that feeds us.

- http://www.colonialfirststate.com.au
Check out my other blog with some of my art and work:

http://jakeherbert.tumblr.com



An interesting read on how The Media's influence Learning Methods

Learning is a dynamic processes driven by a number of factors and is not a one off process. There has been quite a debate on the influence of media on learning has been on for some time now. Overtime the primary media for learning has been books which have specific traits like stability of texts and progression of knowledge over time.In using books the difference between a poor and efficient learner is in ability to decode texts easily. Most book readers use stability of printed books to develop a mental model over time.
Modern technology in media has not been clearly linked to learning outcomes due to its instability. Besides this, modern media like televisions and videos have not been integrated to enhance learning. Therefore they produce content majorly for entertainment with little learning outcomes. In order to benefit from rapidly advancing technology in education media must be integrated with learning otherwise it will become only a platform for movie moguls to get rich.
Television content unlike books is transient and offers information through visual and oral means and can be easily forgotten. The video information is affected by many factors which include their transient nature, presentation in both oral and visual ways which affect learners’ ability to retain content easily.
On the other hand computers as learning medium offer ability to process symbols and symbol systems. They can convert numerals’ into tables and charts and through use of integrated software convert texts into speeches. Computers can also help students to link charts and graphs to real life situations hence help in the development of a mental model. They can turn novices into experts through presentation of informal and abstract ideas in a simpler understandable manner like using arrows to represent force in physics. It can allow learners manipulate symbols to determine consequences, unsuccessful or successful of their choices progressively enlightening novices and improving on their mental models.
It is crystal clear therefore that for learning to occur there must be media to present the information but if learning occurs from this exposure to media then it is because of the information embedded in the media that triggers learning. Media does not have the influence and speed of learning but rather instructional methods in the media influence learning outcomes.
The impact that each media component has on learning differs depending on how knowledge has been integrated and delivered. The content in the media platform will greatly influence learning outcomes otherwise television and video media will only provide entertainment devoid of meaningful learning process.
It is therefore a choice to make learning integral in any media program which will make advancement in technology beneficial to all mankind rather than make money for a few individuals in the movie industry. It therefore calls for combination of media with instructional methods to help learners decode the information.

Digital Altruism: Using Social Media to Support Well-being


From cyberbullying to cyberporn, the media is constantly buzzing about the negative uses of the Internet. This focus on negativity is simply an old paradigm way of getting attention. We've all heard it said that "bad news sells," but as new paradigms increasingly take hold, "the world," as Bob Dylan put it, "is a chang'n." Today, good news is gaining ground; in fact, the digital landscape is saturated with positive activity. Far more people engage in acts of altruism on-line than we're commonly led to believe and it's high time we began talking about it. In fact, research in the area of "digital altruism" suggests that it's a growing phenomenon. Why should we care about the fusion of goodness and the Internet? Because a healthy society depends upon it: In the words of noted futurist, Barbara Marx Hubbard "we must see images of social wellness if we are to have the faith and courage to heal our society and grow."


Some of the best "good news" is that we can use our smart phones and computers to improve our physical, emotional, mental, and spiritualhealth, while simultaneously contributing to the creation of a healthy society. Many of us have already begun using our smart phones to encourage healthy habits, like keeping track of the miles we walk and monitoring our calories, but few realize the many ways we can use them to target our psychological wellbeing. Digital altruism is about making a conscious effort to do just that through using social media to support the development of character strengths and virtues.
Psychologists have studied character strengths and virtues for decades. Some of the most accessible research is that conducted by psychologists Christopher Peterson and Martin Seligman.  Their multi-year research resulted in the VIA Classification system, which identifies six classes of virtue, made up of twenty-four measurable character strengths. The classes and some of the character strengths include:


  • Wisdom & Knowledge: Strengths such as creativity and love of learning
  • Courage: Strengths such as bravery and perseverance
  • Humanity: Strengths such as love and kindness
  • Justice: Strengths such as teamwork and leadership
  • Temperance: Strengths such as forgiveness and humility
  • Transcendence: Strengths that encourage connection and meaning such as appreciation of beautygratitude, hope, andhumor.

- http://www.psychologytoday.com


An eye opening documentary


Thrive is an amazing documentary that covers some interesting topics about the government.
It's An unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what's really going on in our world by following the money upstream - uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.

http://www.thrivemovement.com

Warning: Must have an open mind.


Research

"WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK!"

I found this article very interesting. Hot off the press. Greens senator nails Tony Abbott.

http://junkee.com/tony-abbott-slammed-by-greens-senator-in-jaw-dropping-speech-of-the-year-we-want-our-country-back/30146?utm_source=editorial&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=article_30146